Posts Tagged theology

“Who is God and What Does He Want?” Preschool Theology, Book I

My goal for this summer is to turn my 36-week Bible study “Growing Church Leaders” into a three-volume series of picture books for my preschoolers.  Here’s my first cut at text for the first one, “Think Biblically”, written one tweet at a time:

  1. God is the One who made everything. He made you for a special purpose. He wants everyone to know how He loves them.
  2. God is three persons: a Father who sends us, Jesus the Son who rescues us, and a Spirit who helps us.
  3. God wants us to love Him and other people as much as we love ourself. Sin is when we disobey God’s good purpose for us.
  4. Sin makes it hard for us to know, want or do what is right. Jesus came to earth, died, and rose again to destroy sin.
  5. Following Jesus means believing He loves us more than we love ourself, which means obeying Him will make us the most happy.
  6. God gives us parents, the Bible, church and His Spirit to show us how to love people and be happy His way.
  7. Jesus went to heaven, but will come back to create and rule a new heaven & earth for all who want to live His way.
  8. Until Jesus returns, our job is to show how wonderful it is to live and love the way God wants.
I’m not sure whether it is worrisome, impressive, or embarrassing that I can fit all of systematic theology into eight short paragraphs…

, , ,

Leave a Comment

Knight Club: Moral Authority and the Fourth Dragon

One of the ways I tackle “wicked problems” is by exploring different possible answers in order to help clarify the essential question. My posts on flying and mastering the dragons of manhood have been useful in helping me recognize that the two main questions Knight Club is trying to answer are:

  • What does it mean to be a man?
  • What can we do to help our sons become those kind of men?

I believe the most critical aspect of authentic manhood is “moral authority,” where people trust you will do the right thing.

Importantly, moral authority has three components:

  1. Head: You know the right thing
  2. Heart: You want the right thing
  3. Hand: You can do the right thing

When we meet someone whom we feel we can trust in those three areas, we feel simultaneously safe and adventurous.  Exactly the qualities men want in a mate — and their kids or followers, for that matter.

This doesn’t men have to be perfect at all three  – or even just one of them; otherwise we’d all be hosed.  But men need to be mature in these areas, in terms of typically:

  • Doing something close to the right thing
  • Recognizing when we are in over our head, and getting help

From this perspective, the dragons I’ve been discussing are about having the right kind of heart — learning to want the right thing.

Note that not wanting the wrong things is a side effect. I believe it is critically important for the evangelical church to shifts its focus away from “not wanting the wrong things” to “wanting the right things.”  Yes, there is a place for laws and boundaries, but that should only be at the edges — the lifeblood of our faith ought to be a consistent pursuit of what is most good.

From that perspective, I can summarize and reinterpret my previous discussions in a table:

Dragon Color Nurture Harness
Fear Green Awe vs. Contempt Bravery vs. Cowardice
Anger Red Caring vs. Apathy Discernment vs. Rage
Desire Blue Hope vs. Sloth Discipline vs. Greed
Pride White Honor vs. Victimhood Humility vs. Arrogance

Those of you who’ve been following along may notice that I’ve reshuffled the colors, renamed “Desire” to “Passion”, and added “Pride” as the fourth dragon. I’m still not entirely happy with all the labels, but I’m getting closer to the pictures my head.

My central claim is that emotional maturity for men consists of mastering these four motivations:

  1. Fear
  2. Anger
  3. Desire
  4. Pride

In particular, we need to both “nurture” (strengthen) and “harness” (direct ) the associated emotions by cultivating the virtues (and avoiding the vices) identified in the last two columns, respectively.

This vision of “mastering dragons” is a radical departure from our cultural mindset of “slaying dragons”, particularly when it comes to terms like “pride” and “anger” which (for good reason) are typically seen as negative.  However, there are things we should be angry and proud about, and so far I haven’t found a better word to describe the raw emotion; if you think of one, let me know in the comments.

Of these dragons, the most interesting is Pride, because as the white dragon in can be useful — and deadly! — in managing the other three.  In fact, history teaches us that religious people are the most susceptible to the sin of pride (e.g., The Pharisees, though I’m sure you can easily identify your favorite contemporary example).  Which is arguably why it has such a bad name.

Yet I believe pride is a basic and valuable human emotion.  We (and the Bible) invoke it with words such as a glory, exaltation, rejoicing, celebration, reward, and yes, proud.  I believe it is essential to cultivate a healthy sense of pride (self-esteem? honor?), or else the only leaders we have would be those with an unhealthy type of pride.

Which on my bad days I fear is already the case…

, , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

LEAD! Part A, Revisited

The LEAD! course format evolved considerably during the time I wrote it, especially in the first 3 months. We are working to publish it as a three-volume bible study, which means I need to go back and make the first few lessons consistent with the latter ones. So, I’ll try to rewrite each of the lessons from Part A at the rate of at least one per week.

The new lessons will replace the ones currently in the syllabus; links to the original lessons are archived below.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Song: Gratitude

Part 3 of the Guilt-Grace-Gratitude musical trilogy, from my 1996 meditations on The Grace Cycle.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , ,

Leave a Comment

LEAD! Syllabus for “Theological Foundations”

[NOTE: the official syllabus is now on the "Lead" page; this post is obsolete, but kept for the sake of historical continuity].

[Yes, I should probably have written this before the first lesson, but better late than never...]

In thinking about it, I ought to take my Curriculum one step further, and actually identify the passages and key learnings for each lesson. Not only will this help ensure I’m on the same page as my pastor, but it would enable others to write some of the lessons (since class starts on September 4th!).

I’ve also cross-referenced these lessons against two common systematic theology books:

In addition to providing a sort index to the topics covered, this allows students and teachers to use those as supplementary textbooks.

  • Draft 1 – Sunday, 24th August
  • Draft 2 – Tuesday, 26th August: Added “Doctrine” “Essentials” chapters for each lesson
  • Draft 3 – Friday, 29th August: Added “Doctrines” chapters for each lesson

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

LEAD! Curriculum Reset for “Theological Foundations”

So, the good news is that our church is gearing up to start LEAD! on September 4th, and already taking applications! That’s also the bad news, since I’ve only finished three classes. :-(

Still, it only takes me about four hours per class, which is two late night waiting-to-feed-Rohan sessions (assuming he behaves), so I should be able to keep up.

The real problem is that my lesson topics have gone in a completely different direction that originally envisioned. More, my pastor has a slightly different vision for how things should fit together. Given the time timeframes, it is essential we get on the same page (and stick to it, if possible).

Here’s my current vision for what is now being called “Theological Foundations”. Hopefully my pastor and I can converge on this syllabus soon (once he’s no longer busy with his new grandson :-)

[Updated and ratified 8/19 with John Isaacs]

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

LEAD! Part A: Thinking Theo-Logically

The LEAD! Bible Study is a tripod, built on three legs:

  • theological education
  • character formation
  • skill development

While these roughly correspond to three 12-week “trimesters”, the larger goal is to incorporate all three aspects in each and every segment. The question thus becomes, what is the most effective way to integrate theological truth into the lives of lay leaders?

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

Leave a Comment

Requirements for Transforming Leadership

As part of my journey to rethink leadership training, I wanted to summarize the goals and constraints of such a process. Here’s a first cut…

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

CTE Light: Imago Christi

In my Rules of War, I assert that the most important challenge is to “Know your Objective” — i.e., understand where you are going. Earlier, I stated that The Purpose of Comprehensive Theological Education was:

to equip leaders for a lifelong journey of bringing their “whole selves” (heart, soul, mind & strength) and “whole worlds” (family, church, community & marketplace) into ever-increasing alignment with God’s purpose (redemption, kingdom & glory).

There’s a more concise way to phrase that: conforming to the image of Christ, aka “Imago Christi”. I consider this the central tenet and purpose of Comprehensive Theological Education. Over time (I have no idea when), I hope to fill in other ‘CTE Lights’. Stay tuned…

, , ,

Leave a Comment

Keys to the CTE

Even though I haven’t posted for a while, I’ve been thinking a lot about Comprehensive Theological Education. In particular, I’ve been trying to identify the key “success factors” necessary to improve upon traditional methods. Here’s my current list. Any thing you’d like to add, Gentle Reader?

[Updated March 9th to use "over", based on Andrew's comments on Pressing In]

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , ,

2 Comments

The Purpose of Comprehensive Theological Education

As I’ve been meditating on the idea of “Comprehensive Theology“, I’ve begun to realize that it’s main difference from systematic theology isn’t merely (or even primarily) the content. Rather, it is whole pedagogy associated with traditional theological instruction I am reacting against. I might characterize (caricature?) the traditional model as:

The purpose of Academic Theological Education [ATE] is to indoctrinate students into an intellectual understanding of, and belief in, the central truths of their religious tradition.

As contrasted with:

The purpose of Comprehensive Theological Education [CTE] is to equip leaders for a lifelong journey of bringing their “whole selves” (heart, soul, mind & strength) and “whole worlds” (family, church, community & marketplace) into ever-increasing alignment with God’s purpose (redemption, kingdom & glory).

My original thought was “ATE bad, CTE good” — but that actually is not the case. Read more for details…

Read the rest of this entry »

, ,

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 838 other followers