This user hasn't shared any biographical information
“Who is God and What Does He Want?” Preschool Theology, Book I
Posted in Leadership on May 31, 2012
My goal for this summer is to turn my 36-week Bible study “Growing Church Leaders” into a three-volume series of picture books for my preschoolers. Here’s my first cut at text for the first one, “Think Biblically”, written one tweet at a time:
- God is the One who made everything. He made you for a special purpose. He wants everyone to know how He loves them.
- God is three persons: a Father who sends us, Jesus the Son who rescues us, and a Spirit who helps us.
- God wants us to love Him and other people as much as we love ourself. Sin is when we disobey God’s good purpose for us.
- Sin makes it hard for us to know, want or do what is right. Jesus came to earth, died, and rose again to destroy sin.
- Following Jesus means believing He loves us more than we love ourself, which means obeying Him will make us the most happy.
- God gives us parents, the Bible, church and His Spirit to show us how to love people and be happy His way.
- Jesus went to heaven, but will come back to create and rule a new heaven & earth for all who want to live His way.
- Until Jesus returns, our job is to show how wonderful it is to live and love the way God wants.
Knight Club #1: 4 PM, Sat June 16 at Newhall Park, San Jose
Posted in Knight Club on May 31, 2012
Calling all Fathers and Sons:
Rohan and Davey invite you to join us in a couple weeks for “Knight Club” – a time of physical and spiritual exercise for boys and dads*
4 PM to 5:30 PM Saturday, June 16thNewhall Park, San Jose (the corner of Newhall Street and Campbell Avenue)
http://goo.gl/maps/3Lai
We will sweat. We will pray. We will grow stronger — together!
The Knight’s Chant: The Promise of Holiness
Posted in Knight Club on May 29, 2012
I AM A KNIGHT (fist straight up in the air)
KNIGHTS DO WHAT’S RIGHT (pound fist in hand)
I KNOW WHAT’S RIGHT (salute)
I WANT WHAT’S RIGHT (fist over heart)
I CAN DO WHAT’S RIGHT (fist forward)
WE ARE STRONG (make muscles)
WE USE OUR STRENGTH (hands on waist)
TO PROTECT THE WEAK (hands reaching down)
TO HELP OUR FRIENDS (hands straight out to the side)
TO SERVE THE CHURCH (hands forward, palms up)
TO HONOR GOD (hands up to heaven)
AMEN! (hands clasped together overhead)
[YELL] (clap)
Knight Club: How to Ride a Dragon
Posted in Knight Club on March 17, 2012
Yesterday I gave my son Rohan (age 3 and 5/6ths) a set of colored dragons and attempted to explain my four-dimensional system for emotional maturity. He grasped the basic idea quite quickly, though I had to modify some of the terms (e.g., “Obedience” instead of “Humility”).
| Dragon | Spurs | Reins |
|---|---|---|
| Fear | Safety | Bravery |
| Anger | Caring | Thoughtfulness |
| Desire | Hope | Patience |
| Pride | Honor | Obedience |
What’s interesting about this list is that the “Spurs” column is more maternal/feminine, while the “Reins” are more paternal/masculine.
I may label the combination of “Bravery-Thoughtfulness-Patience-Obedience” as the martial virtues, with “Safety-Caring-Hope-Honor” as the domestic virtues. The martial virtues are what we expect of soldiers. They are what we fight with, as opposed to the domestic virtues — which are what we fight for.
Another thought I had is that for girls, the order might be reversed. I’ve been talking with Rohan’s preschool teacher about adapting “Knight Club” for her classroom, with a corresponding “Princess Club” for girls. However, I have very little insight into the core issues facing women and girls. It seems likely that these same four emotions drive their behavior, but it is equally likely that they pathologize differently.
I wonder if when switching from dragons (for knights) to horses (for princesses), the domestic virtues are the reins and the martial values the spurs:
| Horses | Spurs | Reins |
|---|---|---|
| Fear | Bravery | Safety |
| Anger | Thoughtfulness | Caring |
| Desire | Patience | Hope |
| Pride | Obedience | Honor |
Maybe not, but having at least a “wrong answer” gives me something to start with, and perhaps inspire feedback from those who understand better.
Knight Club: Moral Authority and the Fourth Dragon
Posted in Knight Club on March 15, 2012
One of the ways I tackle “wicked problems” is by exploring different possible answers in order to help clarify the essential question. My posts on flying and mastering the dragons of manhood have been useful in helping me recognize that the two main questions Knight Club is trying to answer are:
- What does it mean to be a man?
- What can we do to help our sons become those kind of men?
I believe the most critical aspect of authentic manhood is “moral authority,” where people trust you will do the right thing.
Importantly, moral authority has three components:
- Head: You know the right thing
- Heart: You want the right thing
- Hand: You can do the right thing
When we meet someone whom we feel we can trust in those three areas, we feel simultaneously safe and adventurous. Exactly the qualities men want in a mate — and their kids or followers, for that matter.
This doesn’t men have to be perfect at all three – or even just one of them; otherwise we’d all be hosed. But men need to be mature in these areas, in terms of typically:
- Doing something close to the right thing
- Recognizing when we are in over our head, and getting help
From this perspective, the dragons I’ve been discussing are about having the right kind of heart — learning to want the right thing.
Note that not wanting the wrong things is a side effect. I believe it is critically important for the evangelical church to shifts its focus away from “not wanting the wrong things” to “wanting the right things.” Yes, there is a place for laws and boundaries, but that should only be at the edges — the lifeblood of our faith ought to be a consistent pursuit of what is most good.
From that perspective, I can summarize and reinterpret my previous discussions in a table:
| Dragon | Color | Nurture | Harness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fear | Green | Awe vs. Contempt | Bravery vs. Cowardice |
| Anger | Red | Caring vs. Apathy | Discernment vs. Rage |
| Desire | Blue | Hope vs. Sloth | Discipline vs. Greed |
| Pride | White | Honor vs. Victimhood | Humility vs. Arrogance |
Those of you who’ve been following along may notice that I’ve reshuffled the colors, renamed “Desire” to “Passion”, and added “Pride” as the fourth dragon. I’m still not entirely happy with all the labels, but I’m getting closer to the pictures my head.
My central claim is that emotional maturity for men consists of mastering these four motivations:
- Fear
- Anger
- Desire
- Pride
In particular, we need to both “nurture” (strengthen) and “harness” (direct ) the associated emotions by cultivating the virtues (and avoiding the vices) identified in the last two columns, respectively.
This vision of “mastering dragons” is a radical departure from our cultural mindset of “slaying dragons”, particularly when it comes to terms like “pride” and “anger” which (for good reason) are typically seen as negative. However, there are things we should be angry and proud about, and so far I haven’t found a better word to describe the raw emotion; if you think of one, let me know in the comments.
Of these dragons, the most interesting is Pride, because as the white dragon in can be useful — and deadly! — in managing the other three. In fact, history teaches us that religious people are the most susceptible to the sin of pride (e.g., The Pharisees, though I’m sure you can easily identify your favorite contemporary example). Which is arguably why it has such a bad name.
Yet I believe pride is a basic and valuable human emotion. We (and the Bible) invoke it with words such as a glory, exaltation, rejoicing, celebration, reward, and yes, proud. I believe it is essential to cultivate a healthy sense of pride (self-esteem? honor?), or else the only leaders we have would be those with an unhealthy type of pride.
Which on my bad days I fear is already the case…
Knight Club: Flying the Dragons of Anger, Fear, & Desire
Posted in Knight Club on March 3, 2012
In my previous post, on mastering the three dragons of manhood, I discussed the ideal masculine character as harnessing the:
- Red Dragon of Anger
- Green Dragon of Fear
- Gold Dragon of Desire
In this post, I want to explore using anger to go fast, fear to go straight, and desire to go high. Since we’re discussing dragons, the X-Y-Z motion of a rocket seems apt. :-)
- Anger-mastery manages our speed via Meekness (braking) and Protectiveness (acceleration).
- Fear-mastery steers us via Courage (to keep us away from Cowardice on the left) and Reverence (to keep us from Recklessness on the right).
- Desire-mastery lifts us up with Hope to avoid the mountains of Despair, but keep us close enough to the ground with Contentment to avoid the storms of Greed.
The three-dimensional metaphor seems to work pretty well. I have a hard time of thinking of any male-specific issues that aren’t directly traceable to these three dragons, or countered by these virtues.
We have at least a rough association with the cardinal virtues:
- Courage is central, obviously
- Justice is closely tied to Protectiveness
- Temperance or Moderation fits well with Contentment
- Wisdom is connected to Reverence (“The Fear of the Lord”), though perhaps not contained by it
In terms of theological virtues, we obviously have Hope, but no clear analogues to Faith and Love. Both of those conquer Fear and fill us with holy Desire, which implies I’ve named the Dragons correctly — but my theory of virtue seems incomplete.
Looks like I’ll have to figure out whether I need better labels, a different model, or just additional context. Wish me luck!
Knight Club: Mastering the Three Dragons of Manhood
Posted in Knight Club on March 3, 2012
In Sheila Walsh’s Will, God’s Mighty Warrior, there’s a scene where Will and his buddy Josh are pretending to be on a quest against monstrous beasts. They run into Will’s large English sheepdog. Josh is starting to defend himself, but Will assures his friend that “I have tamed this wild creature, and now use it to serve me.”
One of the hot trends in education these days is Mastery Learning: students are expected to master a concept before they move on, not just fill their seats until the class moves on. It is similar to Ranks in the Boy Scouts of America, where you need a certain number and type of accomplishments to move from Tenderfoot up through Eagle.
So what is the analogue in Knight Club? What are we mastering?
I think there are three dragons we face as men:
- The Red Dragon of Anger
- The Green Dragon of Fear
- The Gold Dragon of Desire
Women probably face these too. But when men fail in these areas, the results are devastating.
In Knight Club, we do not slay dragons. Like Will, we “tame them so they serve us.”
Think about it. I don’t want men who lack fear, anger, or desire. And I certainly don’t want men who are overwhelmed by any of them!
But imagine what we could with a legion of men who know how to ride their anger, fear, and desire like men ride a horse (or a dragon!)?
Fear-mastery is Courage on the one side and Reverence on the other. We need to not fear the wrong things but must have a healthy fear of the right things.
Desire-mastery is similarly Contentment (vs wanting too much) and Hope (vs settling for too little).
But what about Anger-mastery? Do we have any words that specifically describe the virtue(s) of guarding against too little (or even too much) anger?
The only one I can think of is very well-known yet almost never used: “meekness”, denoting controlled strength, though often confused with “weakness.”
Figuring out the right way to frame anger-mastery is tricky, but vital. Out-of-control anger from men is the most terrifying thing on earth, whether from toddlers or terrorists.
Yet I would argue that insufficient anger from men is even more devastating. Where can I go to find men filled with anger against poverty, disease, and brutality who are fighting to save the world? Wonderful people do those things out of duty and compassion, but imagine how fast we’d move if we could fully exploit the power of anger.
Of course, we could easily move in the wrong direction. That is why anger has be mastered, like harnessing a dragon to a millstone. And maybe these three masteries aren’t enough, and there are other essential virtues (like Wisdom) needed to complete the mix.
But if you can think of a word to describe the virtue of “being angry the right amount at the right things,” it would sure help me figure out how to cultivate it. Thanks.
Update: How about the combination of “meek” (not too angry) and “protective” (angry when important)?
Knight Club: The Vicious Virtues
Posted in Knight Club on March 1, 2012
I often feel I owe my success more to my “vices” than to my “virtues.”
What is a virtue? What is a vice?
- Impatience
- Anger
- Rebelliousness
- Restlessness
- Infatuation
- Daydreaming
- Desire
- Goofing Off
- Subversive Activity
- Laziness
- Quitting
- Boredom
- Fighting
- Delusions of Grandeur
Society — especially school, but the church is arguably worse — tells us these are crimes to be stamped out.
They’re half-right. I call them the vicious virtues. When misdirected, they can easily destroy both self and society.
But if you can master them — and through them master yourself — you can fix the world.
How do we create an alternative form of learning that embraces creative chaos and harnesses the vicious virtues, rather than fighting them?
Knight Club: Levels of Love
Posted in Knight Club on February 29, 2012
The first rule of Knight Club: you must talk about Knight Club.
In the comments on my first Knight Club post, my friend Jor Bratko talks about “raising adults”, and points out that:
the legitimacy of my authority like all legitimate authority comes from love: the care of the other
He is absolutely correct. I actually knew this, but I didn’t understand how it applied to fatherhood. Part of the problem is that the English word “love” refers to (at least) three different phenomena, which in this context I call Baby Love, Bro Love, and Boss Love — loosely inspired by the four loves described by C.S. Lewis.
1. Baby Love “My Need”
At the baby level, love is defined in terms of “my need”, in two ways:
- I know you love me because you meet my needs.
- I love you because you meet my needs.
2. Bro Love “Our Joy”
As we grow from babies to boys, we learn the second kind of love centered around “our fun” — mutual pleasure:
- I know you love me — and I love you — because we share joys together.
3. Boss Love “Your Glory”
The ultimate love, though, goes well beyond the first two to seek the other’s glory:
- I love you by seeking your glory above my own
- I know you love me for my glory, even if it interferes with my needs or our joy
This is the love God has for us, typically characterized by the Greek ‘agape‘. “Boss Love” is why God hides His glory and gives humans dominion over the earth (and the answer to the paradox of why a loving and powerful God allows evil to exist in the world).
Boss Love is also how and why wise fathers launch their sons into the world. A big part of Knight Club is helping me explicitly figure out what other fathers tend to assume intuitively. It takes me a while, but has the advantage that I can eventually explain it to others, hopefully in a reproducible way. Wish me luck!
P.S. Yes, I don’t cover the fourth love, ‘eros.’ Partly because I’m talking about men, but also because the English equivalent spans all three of the categories I talk about — with often a great deal of ambiguity and confusion about which is intended! I’m not sure how exactly it fits in. Hopefully I’ll figure it out in the next decade before my son hits adolescence…
Knight Club: The Knight’s Code
Posted in Knight Club on February 28, 2012
The following is based on 1 – Introduction – The Training of a Knight – Age of Chivalry – Thomas Bulfinch, adapted surprisingly little to match the challenges of a preschool boy in modern America.
Knights:
- Respect their elders
- Serve the church
- Help their friends
- Protect the weak
I added the converse, to help clarify appropriate versus inappropriate behavior.
Bullies:
- Disobey their elders
- Disrupt the church
- Fight their friends
- Take from the weak
Knight Club: Where Fathers and Sons Learn to Win Life’s Most Important Battles
Posted in Knight Club on February 28, 2012
Recently our church has been wrestling with what it means to be “missional” — a family on mission together. My wife and I have been struggling with the same question, particularly with regards to raising our precocious (and sometimes rebellious) 3-and-5/6ths year-old son Rohan. I knew he needed to be more respectful and obedient, but (for whatever reason) I didn’t feel comfortable simply demanding that by fiat. As a result, we’d been more-or-less stuck on this issue for many months. For Lent, Respectful Obedience has become one of my top four requests (along with Emotional Connection, Sustainable Integration, and Viral Transformation).
Thursday night, I decided to pray about it while putting Rohan back to sleep after he woke me up at 1 AM. I felt God say I should look at how He dealt with his children: Adam, Noah, Moses, Abraham, David, etc. In most of those cases, God chooses someone, gives them an assignment, and then — after they’ve taken a leap of faith — He makes a covenant with them. In short, I need to start thinking in terms of discipling Rohan (teaching him to obey God) — rather than merely parenting Rohan (teaching him to obey me).
On the one hand, this shift feels a bit premature. Most curriculum I’ve seen tends to focus simply on teaching younger kids basic facts about God the Bible, and doesn’t engage in active spiritual formation until (at the earliest) seven or eight. The usual perspective (which I largely agree with) is that first kids learn to obey their parents and teachers, and only later learn to obey God.
Then again, the same could be said about Christian education in general, up to and including seminary. That was a key motivation behind my book Growing Church Leaders, which attempts to integrate knowledge, wisdom, and service into a holistic approach to Christian maturity and leadership. Maybe we need to rethink parenting as discipleship — and vice versa! — starting from toddlers on up.
Especially for boys. Many of the Rohan’s most annoying qualities as a toddler — impatience, self-will, righteous anger — are the same that would make him a great leader as an adult, if properly directed. I don’t want to squelch those passions, but it is imperative that he learn to master them.
Which brings me to Knight Club. The goal of Knight Club is to help fathers and sons learn to win’s life most important battles. To do this, we work together to train our heart, soul, mind and strength to reflect the image of Christ.
Right now it is just him and me, but I have a suspicion this is something that will appeal to many other fathers and sons.
I have grandiose dreams of curating a global curriculum with comprehensive gamification on becoming a mature man of God, but right now I’m starting with one Bible verse:
Interested? Stay tuned for more…
Partially Examined Assumptions from PEL #46: Plato on Ethics & Religion
Posted in Beliefs on November 25, 2011
Dear Partially Examined Life podcasters,
Like Skepoet, I was very impressed by your recent episode on Plato’s “Euthyphro.” And yes, Seth, I deeply appreciated your perspective on Judaism. In particular, it helped me realize that modern Christianity in practice actually functions the way you describe Judaism (with decisions made by a small group of authorities revered for their understanding of the text), even if in theory it we claim our theology is a matter of rigorous logical deductions available to all.
That said, my overall reaction was much like the one Socrates had:
But I see plainly that you are not disposed to instruct me-dearly not: elsewhy, when we reached the point, did you turn, aside? Had you only answered me I should have truly learned of you by this time the-nature of piety.
I freely admit I am a philosophical dilettante and undoubtedly biased my religious upbringing. That is why (like Socrates to Euthyphro :-) I come to you who seem so certain to in hopes of illuminating my ignorance. Yet just when you seem on the verge of actually addressing the problem I care about, you veer away. Perhaps you can help me understand why…
Partially Examined Questions
Posted in Beliefs on October 27, 2011
Dear Mark, Seth, and Wes,
Thanks for the shout out on the The Partially Examined Life blog. First of all, I want to apologize for my snarky and apparently misleading comments on your Facebook page; let me know when I’ve expended $10 worth of annoyance and I’ll make another donation. :-)
Now that I’ve got your attention, though, let me try to articulate my concerns more coherently, to hopefully inspire a more substantive critique. It is pretty verbose, though, so I’ve posted a reply on my own blog, below. You can reply either there or on your own post, whichever is more convenient.
Falling Up
Posted in Art on July 13, 2011
I am falling, falling.
It is neither hot not cold, I feel nothing. I see nothing.
Just falling, falling. Down, down, down…
I wake up. I am lying on my back in a field of wild grass. The smell of earth fills my nostrils. The air is warm, springlike. The sun is up, but not too hot. I am alone.
I stand up and dust myself off. Expectant, but not impatient.
He comes. I do not see Him, but I feel His presence drawing near. I wait.
The Voice speaks. “Welcome, my son.”
My mouth quirks. “Hello. Father.”
The Voice smiles, though I still see nothing. “Yes, I am your father. And many other things, including your enemy. But above all else, your father.”
I say nothing. There has been no question. There is nothing to say.
The Voice grins. “Come”, He says, and gestures without hands.
***
John Isaacs Sermon
Posted in Editorial on May 7, 2011
Posterous test
Sermon: “Road to Joy” – A Boundaries Remix
Posted in Editorial on May 3, 2011
Growing Church Leaders now on Amazon
Posted in Editorial, Leadership on April 11, 2011
I should have mentioned this awhile ago, but I am very excited to have my new book available on Amazon.com <http://amzn.to/growchurch> in both softcover and Kindle editions.
2010 in review
Posted in Editorial on January 2, 2011
The stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads This blog is on fire!.
Crunchy numbers
A Boeing 747-400 passenger jet can hold 416 passengers. This blog was viewed about 5,400 times in 2010. That’s about 13 full 747s.
In 2010, there were 20 new posts, growing the total archive of this blog to 691 posts. There were 24 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 12mb. That’s about 2 pictures per month.
The busiest day of the year was January 15th with 148 views. The most popular post that day was Kenneth James Sniecinski’s Personal Blurb.
Where did they come from?
The top referring sites in 2010 were facebook.com, drernie.com, otpproductions.com, mail.live.com, and inthesunnyspot.net.
Some visitors came searching, mostly for jon andreas, scripture observation application prayer, soap scripture observation application prayer, a long obedience in the same direction – pdf, and purpose driven life chapter 26.
Attractions in 2010
These are the posts and pages that got the most views in 2010.
Kenneth James Sniecinski’s Personal Blurb November 2005
Growing Church Leaders March 2010
1 comment
Proverbs 3:5-6 SOAP (Scripture Observation Application Prayer) for LDT July 2007
What You Can Do to Help Those Behind Bars by Jon Andreas July 2007
18 comments
Demolishing Strongholds by Philip John October 2007
The Headship of Christ
Posted in Editorial on November 7, 2010
How to Fix California
Posted in Editorial on November 7, 2010
Our presentation How To Fix California is currently being featured on the SlideShare homepage by their editorial team.




